I’m going to compare again and I just hope that nobody will end up with hurt feelings! Just kidding! Yes, it is true that I’m going to make yet another comparison, but that will be a comparison between two different types of microphones, such as Shure SM7B and AKG C214.
These two microphones sure promise a lot, but they also have differences, and I’m here to put those differences in the first line.
But, if you have been reading my articles, you are aware that when I write a comparison article, at first I write an overview of both products that I have to compare, and then I proceed to actually compare them, and I’m going to do the exact same thing in this article, as well. So, let’s go!
Overview of Shure SM7B and AKG C214
The SM7B’s wide-range frequency response keeps the exquisite beauty of the sounds it records. Words may travel a long way thanks to their comprehensive audio profiles, but they always reach their destination in perfect quality and clarity.
With Shure SM7B only clean air passes through, both mechanical noise and breathiness are eliminated by the pop filter and air suspension shock isolation. Words pass through while the rest is kept out of the conversation.
With Shure SM7B you will get an identical capture. Off-axis audio is rejected by the traditional cardioid pattern. Thus, you can sing or speak at a comfortable angle while getting the exact sound you want with the least amount of coloring.
To eliminate hum from computer displays and other studio equipment, Shure SM7B consists of cutting-edge electromagnetic shielding, so you with this microphone you will be the protector of your own voice.
This microphone consist of a robust design which helps a lot to hold the microphone cartridge.
Switch cover plate and detachable close-talk windscreen are also included. It minimizes distortion caused by loud sources.
Shure SM7B does adjustments for mid-range emphasis (presence boost) and bass rolloff, with a graphic representation of the response choice.
The dynamic cartridge of this microphone delivers incredibly clear and authentic voice and music reproduction with a flat, wide-range frequency response.
Additionally, this microphone is helpful for close-miking instruments in studio where warm and smooth full-frequencies are a must.
Specifications and characteristics of Shure SM7B:
- Microphone Type: Dynamic
- Polar Pattern: Cardioid
- Frequency Response: 50Hz-20kHz
- Output Impedance: 150 ohms
- Low Cut Filter: Bass Roll off
- Color: Black
- Connector: XLR
- Dimensions: 7.49″ x 2.5″
- Weight: 1.69 lbs.
- Included Accessories: Windscreen, Switch Cover Plate
The AKG C214 reproduces the company’s signature large-diaphragm sound and boasts a dynamic range of an astonishing 143dB for uncompressed, realistic transients.
The AKG C214 is the ideal vocal microphone if you’re looking for the best. And even while that quality alone makes it well worth the cost, you’ll discover that the C214 plays equally well on a range of instruments.
The C214 can be utilized onstage for near miking loud applications like drum overheads, guitar amps, or high-output brass because of its switchable 20dB attenuation pad and low-cut filter, which allow it to operate in sound fields as loud as 156dB SPL. The C214 is a fantastic mic to have on your hands and for any situation.
AKG microphones are built to perform exceptionally well. For even higher acoustic accuracy, the C214 has an integrated capsule suspension that lowers mechanical noise and resonances.
Additionally, the double mesh, all-metal grille of the microphone shields the capsule and provides exceptional RF protection without degrading its acoustical performance. The C214 has a contemporary scratch-resistant coating, a dent-resistant metal grille, and a gold-plated XLR output, making it a road-worthy microphone, as well.
Specifications and characteristics of AKG C214:
- Microphone Type: Condenser
- Polar Pattern: Cardioid
- Frequency Response: 20Hz-20kHz
- Output Impedance: 200 ohms
- Low Cut Filter: 160Hz (-6dB/octave)
- Color: Matte Grey Blue
- Connector: XLR
- Dimensions: 11.3 x 8.6 x 3.9 inches
- Weight: 0.62 lbs.
- Included Accessories: H85 Shockmount, Metal Carry Case
Shure SM7B VS. AKG C214
Your voice will be better articulated and have a more detailed sound overall thanks to the C214’s condenser construction and high sensitivity.
The aim is to take care of your room well enough to keep out all those strange bathroom noises and other things. The SM7B virtually eliminates ambient noise, but you’ll have less detail in your music as a result.
Ambient, background, and other types of noise are frequently picked up by condenser microphones like the C214. They gather everything up! Due of their extreme sensitivity, they considerably profit from acoustic sound treatment. A dynamic mic, like the SM7B, is intended to cancel out background noise.
To operate, the C214 requires 48v phantom power from a mixer or audio interface. Although the SM7B doesn’t need phantom power to operate, it does need a good preamp. The alternative is to use the Cloudlifter + Audio Interface option.
Design and Built
Two distinct windscreens are included with the SM7B. Although the C214 doesn’t come with windscreens or pop filters, you should normally spend money on at least one windscreen for this microphone.
Each of these microphones has a strikingly different appearance. While the C214 is normally equipped with a desk stand or traditional mic stand, the SM7B typically uses a boom arm as its support.
The SM7B is a dynamic microphone, whereas the C214 is a cardioid condenser microphone. The C214 includes a -20dB pad and a low-cut filter, whereas the SM7B has a bass roll-off switch and a mid-range emphasis control.
It is true that I have just made a comparison between these two amazing microphones, but again, the final decision is up to you, because you know best what you need for your studio or for whatever you are looking for to purchase one of these microphones.
I made sure to include the same specifications for both of the microphones, so you can make a comparison yourself, as well.
I hope you enjoyed the article and I also hope that you will manage to come to a verdict and make the right purchase.
I sincerely hope you liked what you read. If so, you can read blog after blog.
likewise the distinction between a 2.0 and 2.1 soundbar.
- Hifiman Sundara vs Hifiman HE560: Which Is Better? - July 16, 2022
- JBL Charge 4 vs JBL Xtreme 3: Which Is Better? - July 16, 2022
- Bookshelf Speakers vs Studio Monitors: What’s The Difference? - July 16, 2022